BDSMforyou

Can you set aside your BDSM feelings for your partner?

By Mrs Moriah6 min read
In this article
  1. When love and desire do not follow the same path
  2. The idea of freedom outside the relationship
  3. The silent loss of an unlived part of yourself
  4. Is staying despite what is missing comparable to staying for the children?
  5. Acceptance does not always mean participation
  6. The courage to stay honest
  7. Respect for the dilemma itself
  8. Perhaps the real question is a different one
  9. Source

“Can you set aside your BDSM feelings for your partner?” was written for BDSMforyou.nl by Mistress Moriah.

In relationships, people often talk about compromise. About meeting each other halfway. About give and take. About growing towards each other. Those are beautiful ideals. They form the foundation of connection, trust and lasting love. But sometimes there is something that doesn't simply fall under the heading of 'compromise'. Something that goes deeper than preference. Deeper than curiosity. Deeper even than sexual taste.

BDSM feelings

For many people, BDSM feelings are part of who they are. Not as a hobby or a phase, but as an essential part of how they experience intimacy, surrender, control, tension and connection. And then comes the painfully honest question: can you really set that aside for your partner?

It is a question that is rarely asked lightly. Because when you ask it, it usually means that love and desire no longer coincide as a matter of course. You love someone. You want to continue together. But something in you keeps calling out, softly or sometimes very loudly, that you are not living a part of yourself. Not expressing it. Not sharing it or having it acknowledged. And that chafes. Not always immediately. Sometimes years later. But it chafes.

When love and desire do not follow the same path

Many relationships begin without BDSM playing a clear role. Sometimes because someone hasn't fully discovered their feelings yet. Sometimes because it doesn't seem a priority. Sometimes because it simply never comes up. Only when the relationship deepens, stabilises and feels safer is there room to be more honest about desires. Then comes the moment when someone carefully says: this lives in me. This is important to me.

And then what happens in many relationships happens. The other person listens. Tries to understand. But doesn't feel it themselves. Or even feels resistance. Fear. Incomprehension. Insecurity. Sometimes the response is curious, but real involvement stays absent. Sometimes it is clearly said: this doesn't suit me. I don't want this.

That doesn't mean there is no love. Quite the opposite. It is precisely because there is love that it becomes complicated. Because love makes you want to stay. To adapt. To protect what you have built together. But love cannot always replace what is missing. And that realisation can slowly grow like a silent pain.

The idea of freedom outside the relationship

Some couples look for a middle path. The partner who has no need for BDSM gives the other the space to experience that part outside the relationship. In theory that sounds mature, open-minded and respectful. It seems like a solution in which nobody has to give anything up.

In practice it often proves more complex. Because permission is not the same as emotional peace. Jealousy can surface at unexpected moments. Insecurity can grow. Comparison can creep in. Even if both partners agree rationally, the feeling can do something else.

For the person who is given the space, it can also feel twofold. Freedom can be experienced as both relief and separation. As if an important part of you isn't allowed to exist alongside your relationship, but has to live somewhere else. In another room. With another key. That can feel like a fragmentation of yourself.

Sometimes it works. Sometimes a balance develops. But by no means always. Because human connection cannot be organised entirely through agreements. Feelings move. Relationships change. And what first seemed workable can still start to chafe later.

The silent loss of an unlived part of yourself

What is often underestimated is what it means to suppress an essential desire for a long time. Not temporarily. Not while waiting for something. But structurally. Year after year. People can do a lot. We can adapt, rationalise, put things into perspective. We can convince ourselves that love matters more than fulfilment. That stability matters more than authenticity. And sometimes that really is true. But suppression rarely disappears without leaving traces.

It can show itself as restlessness. As frustration without a clear cause. As fantasies that become more intense. As a feeling of inner distance. As if you have locked a room inside yourself and thrown away the key, but every now and then still hear the door knocking.

Some people become quieter. Others more irritable. Some lose desire within the relationship. Others feel guilt because they keep longing for something their partner cannot or will not give. These are not signs of ingratitude. They are signals of inner division.

Is staying despite what is missing comparable to staying for the children?

Many people recognise the dilemma from another context. Relationships that continue because there are children. Because there is history, because there is stability and letting go is complicated. Staying can be loving. Responsible. Caring. But staying can also mean that two people unintentionally keep each other trapped in a form that no longer fully fits. Not out of malice, but out of loyalty.

When someone has to structurally hide their deepest desires to preserve the relationship, a similar tension arises. Not visible on the outside. But felt on the inside. And then comes the confronting question: are we protecting the relationship, or are we protecting the fear of losing the other?

Sometimes staying is the right choice. Sometimes it is even a conscious, shared choice that both partners are at peace with. But sometimes staying also means that both people unconsciously deny each other the chance to find a partner who can meet them completely.

Acceptance does not always mean participation

An important distinction within this theme is the difference between acceptance and participation. A partner can accept you for who you are without being able to experience that part with you. That is valuable in itself. Genuine acceptance is rare and precious.

But acceptance does not always replace shared experience. You can be seen without experiencing it together. You can be understood without feeling it together. For some people that is enough. For others it is not. Neither is wrong. It is a matter of inner truth.

The courage to stay honest

What makes this dilemma so intense is that there is no universally right choice. There is only honesty. Towards yourself. Towards your partner. Towards the reality of what you feel and need. Sometimes honesty means consciously choosing your relationship, even though you don't fully live a part of yourself. But then it has to be a real choice. Not a silent sacrifice that slowly turns into reproach.

Sometimes honesty means admitting that love alone is not enough to carry everything. That can be painful. Sad. But also respectful. Because letting someone go because you cannot fully meet each other can also be a form of love. And sometimes honesty means that you keep searching together. Keep talking. Keep exploring. Without pressure, without coercion, without expecting the other to change.

Respect for the dilemma itself

What matters most is acknowledging the complexity. This is not a simple question. Not a choice between right and wrong. It is an existential tension between connection and authenticity. People who struggle with this deserve no quick advice. No judgements and no oversimplifications. Only space to explore their inner truth at their own pace.

Because ultimately the question is not only about BDSM. It is about something more universal. About what it means to be fully yourself in a relationship. And about the price we sometimes pay, consciously or unconsciously, when love and identity do not fully coincide.

Perhaps the real question is a different one

Not: can you set aside your BDSM feelings for your partner?
But: what happens to you, to your partner and to your relationship if you do? And can you live with that answer, in the long term, with open eyes and a calm heart?

For many people, that is exactly where the core of the dilemma lies. And perhaps also the beginning of their most honest choice.

Mistress Moriah

Source

Text: Mistress Moriah
Photography: 123rf.com

Dit artikel is ook beschikbaar in het Nederlands →